| |
|
|
PHASE OBJECTIVES:
Step 1: List checklist comments
Step 2: Group comments
Step 3: ABC analysis
Step 4: Other root causal analyses
Step 5: Summarise analyses |
Step 6: Suggest solutions
Step 7: Write action logs
Step 8: Propose action logs to seniors
Step 9: Inform workforce of proposals
|
|

|
| ANALYSIS OF ROOT CAUSES |
|
= Additional
materials
available,
not on this
website. |
This phase gets to the real reasons for unsafe acts occurring. |
|
|
 |
Step 1: List Checklist Comments |
|
The comments on the back of the observation checklists were written as reasons provided by the operatives for acting out certain KSB.
Write a list of all these comments (word-for-word).
There may not be many comments. Step 4 of this phase provides other methods of finding out the reasons for such behaviours from operatives. |
|
|
|
Step 2: Group Comments |
 |
|
Once step 1 is completed, the list of comments should be grouped into themes. |
|
Example of the KSB of not cleaning splillages:
Poor Equipment |
Relying on Others |
"because it's too difficult with those hoses. I've hurt my back before" |
"no one else does it so why should I"? |
"The sweep doesn't really sweep anything. It's so old." |
"It gets done in the end" |
For real examples, please see the case study example 4.2. |
|
| |
|
Step 3: ABC Analysis |
 |
|
| |
|
|
| Why ABC Analysis? |
|
|
The next step is to analyse the grouped comments from step 2 in order to uncover the various reasons why unsafe practices are continueing on site.
ABC or 'Functional' Analysis is one method of getting to the real (often subconscious) reasons for acting in a certain way.
It is called 'ABC' because it looks at the Antecedents or Activators of a Behaviour and its
Consequences. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Antecedents |
- |
Behaviour |
- |
Consequences |
|
| |
Things that activate or trigger the behaviour. These events occur before the behaviour |
|
An observable act |
|
Things that follow the behaviour that have an affect on it |
|
| |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
| |
(roll over the pictures to see examples)
|
|
|
|
The reason for looking at the Antecendents and the Consequences is because research on behaviour has found that these are two main contingencies that drive people's behaviours.
The impact of consequence also greatly affects the behaviour. The following table explains that consequences can be of high impact or low impact. This means that the consequence of a behaviour will have a big affect (high impact) on a behaviour or a small affect (low impact) on it.
Impact of consequences depend on their SIGNIFICANCE / TIMING / CONSISTENCY.
|
Positive |
Negative |
-Level of Importance
-Personal or Impersonal |
|
Immediate |
Delayed |
|
|
Certain |
Uncertain |
|
More specifically, the combination of these factors determine whether that consequence will greatly or moderately influence a behaviour to occur. The following table illustrates these combinations:
High Impact Consequences |
Low Impact Consequences |
(Immediate & Certain) |
(Delayed & Uncertain) |
|
|
POSITIVE or NEGATIVE |
POSITIVE or NEGATIVE |
& |
& |
IMMEDIATE |
DELAYED |
& |
& |
CERTAIN |
UNCERTAIN |
For example, if you look back to the smoking example provided above, and think of the impact of the example consequences it will soon become clear that low impact consequences for the unsafe behaviour of smoking are very important but negative consequences. See below: |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
Consequences |
Impact of Consequences |
|
Significance |
Timing |
Consistency |
The behaviour
of Smoking |
Positives |
|
|
| Nice Buzz |
Positive |
Immediate |
Certain |
| Removes Craving |
Positive |
Immediate |
Certain |
| nice taste |
Positive |
Immediate |
Certain |
| |
looks cool |
Positive |
Immediate |
Certain |
|
| |
comforting |
Positive |
Immediate |
Certain |
|
| |
Negatives |
|
|
| |
Heart Disease |
Negative |
Delayed |
Uncertain |
|
| |
Cancer |
Negative |
Delayed |
Uncertain |
|
| |
Respiratory infection |
Negative |
Delayed |
Uncertain |
|
| |
complications in pregnancy |
Negative |
Delayed |
Uncertain |
|
| |
yellow nails/teeth |
Negative |
Delayed |
Uncertain |
|
|
|
|
Understanding the impact of consequence is very relevant to understanding why many unsafe behaviours are continued. This is because more often than not unsafe behaviours have consequences that increase the likelihood of that behaviour occuring - positive, immediate and certain.
E.g. *give quarry example |
| Learn more on ABC |
|
|
As ABC analysis is very important for the programme and has been found to be the step that causes the most confusion, it is recommended that the steering team run through the presentation on ABC analysis that can be found in the materials case 4.3b.
This presentation covers the roots of ABC and examples of Antecedents and Consequences.
ABC is also further explained under BBS principles. |
Materials 4.3a - ABC Analysis
Form
 |
| ABC analyse the 20 KSB |
|
|
| (1) For each KSB, list the antecedents and consequences, as obtained from the back of the checklists. You can do this with the aid of the following form.
*ins. pdf of ABC form
NB. There is an interactive version in the materials case 4.3a
(2) Write down the impact of each of the consequences (you can also write this on the form above).
(3) Brainstorm as a group ways to turn consequences of safe actions into PICs and unsafe actions into NDUs. E.g. If there are no positive consequences for people to adhere to wearing PPE, create some!
NB. Remember the key is to reward safe actions and not unsafe ones. |
Materials 4.3b - ABC Presentation
 |
| |
|
Step 4: Other Root Causal Analysis |
 |
|
| |
|
| 5-Whys Exercise |
|
|
What is the 5-Whys? |
|
It's a method where you ask why 5 times and get to the real reason people are carrying out an act unsafely.
Method of carrying out the 5-Whys?
In the materials case 4.4 you will find a sheet to use.
NB>The 5-whys is best obtained through a steering team member asking someone face-to-face, as opposed to leaving the 5-whys on the desks of people.
E.g.
| |
|
| Why don't you wear your hi vis? |
Because it is too short |
| Why is it too short? |
Because that's all they have in the stock room, short hi vis. |
| Why is that all they have in the stockroom? |
|
| |
|
| |
|
For more external information on the 5-Whys click here
|
Materials 4.4 - 5-whys Sheet
 |
| |
|
Step 5: Summarise Analyses |
 |
|
Put all the information found from steps 3 & 4 into a table like the one below. |
|
*ins pdf of table of 5-whys/ABC/back of sheet solutions
|
Materials 4.5 - Solutions Table
|
NB. Please find an modifiably version in the materials case 4.5 |
Clearly this table is just one format example of how to summarise the data to allow for the next step of suggesting solutions. However, this format or something similar will allow the steering team to put forward suggestions based on the analysis.
This is an integral part of a BBS programme as... |
All solutions must be based on the data collected and analysed and specifically on the root causes of the behaviours. |
|
Step 6: Suggest Solutions |
 |
|
1) Using the sumarised table in step 5, brainsorm solutions to fill in the table.
This is best done with an many steering team members present as possible. Others outside of the steering team can also be invited to participate in suggested solutions based on the summarised analyses.
2) With the list of suggestions, decide which ones are going to be carried out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Step 7: Write Action Logs |
 |
|
|
Create an action log. This should include:
-
The suggested solutions from step 6 transformed into tasks
-
The time scales set for each task
- Decide who is going to carry out the task. Here you should try and delegate work to other people outside of the steering team.
|
|
See an example of an action log in the case study example (4.7). |
|
NB> Make sure that the task deadlines are being adhered to. If they are not, find out why and amend the deadline accordingly. |
|
Step 8: Propose Actions Logs to Seniors |
 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|

|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
Step 9: Inform workforce of proposals |
 |
|
| |
|
|
|
PHASE SUMMARY
| In this phase,
analyses of the results from Phase 3 were used to uncover the underlying reasons for the at-risk KSB. This information will be used to make relevant changes to safety in the next phase. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|